Gentrify This

I pledged, from the beginning, to never surrender, unlike the others.

Hearteningly, resistance at the start was ubiquitous. Soon I was to realise that, for many of them, it was just an instinctive aversion. Having occupied this place for so long, it can be hard to conceptualise moving when suddenly presented with the opportunity. Despite their first proposal appearing to be benign, it still failed to empathise with the emotive reality that we’d lived all of our lives here, it was where our children were born and where we watched them grow up, and it’s where relatives and friends died. We’ve lived through the good, the bad, and we stuck up for each other. Just as they were blinded by greed, I too was blinded by my own dogmatic attachment to this community, formed over generations, with it being the purest and most resilient kind. My faith obscured the desperate reality that society faces – any resistance to the pervasiveness of this crass, arrogant capitalist psyche, whose faith that the market ‘always provides the answer’ and finds something’s true value, is futile. We were a trifling inconvenience in the way of an investment opportunity that was deigned to occur because it would make money.

As the weeks passed their latent contempt for us became harder to conceal. Our defiance was as silly as our sentimentality in decaying bricks, mortar and foundations. Unfortunately for them, we were now adjacent to an area of affluence that had become so through being enveloped and then redeveloped to satiate an expanding bourgeoisie demand for modern urban living.

Mistakenly, their public disclosure offered the justification that the eradication of our history was an altruistic endeavour that would aid the nourishment and replenishment of a decaying area. It took a tactical recalibration on their part before they were able placate some of us. They apologised, and called this use of language a mis-judgement. Unsolicited evaluations soon followed, they were accompanied with graphs and charts showing us how we would be getting a great (above market) deal by selling. Eventually they started to appear on our doorsteps, unannounced too, clearly a cynical ploy to appear personable.

They handed us brochures of a development, another one of theirs currently under construction elsewhere, of course, which we could ‘agree to join’, at a ‘significant discount’. I must confess the brochure impressed; its weightiness and the glossy paper suggested a lavish expense and promised sophistication. Its content, suffice to say, didn’t hold the same appeal, but, nonetheless, I could see how its message would to others who’d lived, and had become undaunted by living, a more nomadic life than I. It featured some sanctimonious guff about the virtues of modern living ‘their aims’ and various vistas proposed an idyllic scene of how ‘sustainable, natural architecture inspires clean living’. Modernity, due to its needless synergy with remaining unblemished, meant its buildings lacked character and would never develop it. They were soulless, rudimentary, austere, clean units, easily and lazily prefabricated and erected, designs for people who’d lived easy lives and expected to continue to do so. They were everything which my house was not – impractical, old, odd, and dare I confess, dirty. The chair on which I’m sitting currently certainly was, after decades of coalescence I knew its shape and it knew mine. The fabric of its history, the feel of its scars, dents and indentations were a reminder of its significance in mine. It was a physical embodiment of my personality and how we lived. But such items and their histories didn’t belong in this new prospective environment. These realities of humanity, the clutter and baggage of sentimentality and the waste, excrement, eccentricity, individuality it produced, weren’t represented in brochures or considered as part of an architect’s egotistical vision of how their spaces should be maximised.

The Warren’s were the first to depart, foolishly settling for less than the others who held on to the last. They moved to a new development on the edge of town, surrounded by immigrants, but immigrants with professions and expertise, no taming of radicalised rabble or social mobility required here. Little doubt they were part an initiative to better integrate society, as such there was no sense of community there, no sense of belonging. Word soon spread that the Warren’s quite liked it, or claimed they did, and folk got curious. They had twice as many rooms which all contained more room, plus they had their own garden and a driveway. The house itself was pleasant enough, but all I could hear was the headache inducing din of the motorway half a mile away routing the sound of leaves on newly planted trees being caressed by the breeze.

Once they saw this scope the rest started to capitulate, which only made the developers and the council more aggressive and so the offers they made me started to reduce, and, I suspect my continued resistance antagonised them into further reductions out of spite. By now they’d realised it was entirely about the principle for me. They’d turned a community, this street, our street, my street, into a ghost town, an extinction event had occurred and I was the last Dodo to be hunted, killed and embalmed, then placed in a museum as a relic of a forgotten age for people to ambivalently gawk. Scenes of dereliction, such as our street, are always manufactured, because, from sanitised confines, their inertia conveys wasted ‘potential’. And a wasted profit cannot be tolerated.

Despite the desolation I cleave to this place now more than ever, the exodus only serving to strengthen the memories of what’s been lost. Sam and Karen have families of their own now, and my Tony is dead and gone. Both have implored me to sell. I can forgive them their motivations, they’re both ridden, as most middle income professionals are these days, with materialistic debts and a mortgage for a house they paid too much for. If I capitulated they stood to inherit a good chunk of that money, who else would I leave it to? They’d collect even more if I went into sheltered housing. They’ve yet to suggest that, they’d know how I’d react. But I know that’s their ideal.

After the letter instructing me that the compulsory purchase order had been granted by courts arrived, they upped their final offer as a sign of good will. I told them I’d consider it if our local councillor and the company’s chief would meet me here. They agreed.

In the early hours of the morning before they were due to arrive I started to barricade all sources of airflow in and out of the kitchen. I started with the windows, and then covered most of the sockets with masking tape. Normally this activity would arouse a mixture of concern and suspicion with my neighbours, but I no longer had any. Hours later, and after making the first ever meal I had here – beans on toast – I unplugged the fridge, cooker and all other electrical devices and taped up the rest of the sockets. Now the only orifice that remained unsealed was the door to the kitchen that leads into the living room. Despite the extensiveness of my incubatory work the sultry haze of late spring morning light still managed to penetrate through the miles of tape and chipboard I’d applied. Before sealing the kitchen door I went into the kitchen and removed the gas feed into the boiler, there was a moment of genuine levity, despite what I was about to do, when I realised that sabotage would be far more difficult to achieve with a modern boiler in a new build.

They arrived at ten. As they entered I started to feel queasy for the first time, what the cruelty of the act would mean for Karen and Sam. They’d lose not just me, but the money and only gain the indignity of being associated with it. But it was too late to back out now. I invited them to sit, cordially, which surprised them, and they were overly conciliatory which didn’t surprise me at all. Most importantly they didn’t smell the gas, I could faintly, and I worried that the few hours in its company had dulled my sensitivity to it, and that its odour was more apparent to them. It wasn’t until I went to light a ciggie, I noticed, surreptitiously, and without any tact whatsoever, that they’d produced the documents, unprompted, and pen for me to sign them. Before making a show of stopping myself, I offered that I’d been very rude and asked them if they wanted a cup of tea. I intended to have one, and I explained that I’ve always had one with my morning cuppa. As I walked to the kitchen door, one of them questioned why it was boarded and taped up. She would get no answer, after I applied the necessary pressure the door opened in the way, and the smell walloped me. Then I lit my ciggie, and my anger hit them.

Posted in Fiction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Song Of The Day – Chuck Berry live at the BBC 1972

Saved for posterity. If you like Blues and sublime guitar playing, this is where it’s at folks. There were few who could match this man for showmanship. Case in point – there’s tons of humour when he interacts with audience later on. Regardless of whether you’re familiar with the man’s work or not, it’s well worth an hour and a bit of your time. RIP Chuck.

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Song Of The Day – City Boy by D

From the EP ‘P&D 01’ (2016)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Donald Trump – an agent for Scottish independence

Making political predictions is a foolish endeavour for idiots, like me, see exhibits here, here and here for conclusive proof. Political presumptions are even more idiotic, dangerous even, as nobody viewed Trump as the threat he was. Indeed many scoffed, outright laughed, throughout Donald Trump’s attempt to become US president.

Not now. We laugh when we’re taking the piss out of how ridiculous he looks and sounds and all this is. You have to, but it’s usually prefixed with a nervous grunt of willing denial. Eventually the laughter subsides when we remember that someone who’s been Tango’d, by choice, sports a peculiar comb-over type quiff (or whatever it is), again, by choice, has a preposterous, cartoonish, narcissistic man-child persona and was a second rate reality TV star, is now President of the United States Of America, and that they get given the launch codes to the world’s largest nuclear arsenal.

Fittingly, Ronald Reagan once ‘starred’ in a B movie where he tried to teach a monkey human morals and behaviour. We can consider Reagan’s once unlikely political career, its success, and ‘Bedtime for Bonzo’ as widely prophetic of contemporary American Presidential elections and political discourse. On a more serious note: all the pre-election ridicule, Trump’s subsequent Black Mirrorish executive orders and press conferences and the accompanying hysteria since he’s taken office, has confirmed that those who perceive a political change to be regressive, are usually the last to recognise when it’s about to happen.

Two culpable factions are the cause, and it’s easier to fall into one category or the other than not. For those who were disillusioned, Trump and Brexit, for better or worse, offered them a genuine opportunity to upset the established order and arrest whatever social or economic issue had blighted them. The second; that many believed, and I include myself among this demographic, they had a better grasp of what people were thinking and wanting, or, more specifically, knew what they should want and think, than they did themselves.

Brexit and Trump were two examples of the liberal commentariat that smugly pontificate and dominate their media and social media echo chambers of choice, and the members of their congregations, actually over-estimating their value, numbers and influence over the former group. Suitably this contempt and dismissiveness has proven to be a photo-negative form of the complacency to which the ‘mis-guided’ (and that’s one of the kinder euphemisms) folk assume when blaming social and economic decay on the liberalisation of post war politics.

Take away the contexts in which they exist and the sheer gulf between them and there are merits to both perspectives. If there are limited job opportunities or infrastructure investment in your area, and if no solution or alternative is offered, what have you got to lose by seeking one through unconventional means? Sadly, as many pointed out, Trump and Brexit just happened to be the most immediate and dangerous way to articulate that disaffection.

In contrast to 2014, a Yes vote is positioned to end this trend. For those opposed to Brexit, Scotland’s parting from a UK whose main opposition – the shambolic Labour party – offers no effective political opposition to its separation from the EU, may see Scottish Independence as a chance to reach for the handbrake, to take a breath, to preserve centralist politics and Internationalism as still being virtuous, when the increasing political polarisations occurring in the US and UK are combining to sweep away political centre ground mores as we’ve known them. Fittingly, just as we saw throughout Trump’s bid for presidency and the Brexit vote, the success of the Yes campaign is still being downplayed by the majority of the mass media, based largely on polling data, which, as we’ve observed recently, is completely unreliable.

The result of the previous Independence referendum is partly driving this scepticism. However, the terrain on which the 2014 referendum was fought is no longer; Trump’s election, and in particular, Brexit, have created an additional urgency, almost a sense of dread on both sides. Amongst Independence supporters is a recognition that Brexit has brought us to a precipice of irreversible change that, constitutionally, will permanently end the prospect of Independence should any pre-Brexit referendum fail. Oddly, it’s the Unionists who seem to be really dreading it. The prospect of putting an end to the question of Independence, likely for good, provides the No campaign with a potent election platform that should greatly appeal to its core support, but a number of the arguments they used in 2014 are now irrelevant, or can only be answered with hypothesises.

As Adam Curtis rightly pointed out in this segment (above) from the 2014 edition of Charlie Brooker’s excellent Screenwipe, much of the debate around politics is now nebulous due to an inability to decipher what the truth is and how things will ultimately affect us.

Which brings us to President Trump, he presents a sizable advantage for the Yes campaign, because, while the case for independence should be made on its own merits, it’s easy to form a coherent narrative against him and use it as a supplementary argument against joining an unfavourable Brexit deal (he supports vanquishing the EU) when he’s looking, acting and saying shit like this. I mean just look at the fucking state of him. He’s batshit fucking crazy and unpredictable. If he isn’t sacking his attorney general, blocking Muslim immigrants, hiring a pot plant to be education secretary or openly threatening to end the career of someone who opposes him, he’s cutting funding for foreign abortion clinics and antagonising ISIS, the Chinese, the Russians and dismissing the leaders of smaller countries coldly. And all the while he’s giving the impression he’s the one who’s being victimised.

Plus there’s Bannon, his chief strategist. Sure, he looks like a creep who goes to Asda just to hang around the aisle where the ladies sanitary products are kept, but he harbours a terrifying belief that the brand of American nationalism that fomented Trump’s success will only be cemented through inciting a large scale conflict that can later be mythologised.

Trump’s xenophobic, authoritarian rhetoric shares a broad synergy with long dormant right wing ideals, these were revealed during Brexit and is informing much of the Tories’ prideful pre-negotiation posturing. Aligning Trump’s unlikely ascension with securing a Brexit majority has gratified and emboldened the Tory right wingers to no longer show a hint of shame in rekindling the faith in an isolationist first world utopia. We’ll (providing your one of us) enjoy the benefits of an affinity between predominantly white, English speaking Christian countries, regaining the economic dominance they once had with more privatisation, tighter immigration controls and high defence spending, while the rest of the world pays a premium for our produce.

You may believe, as I do, that the Tories have a bluff hand, yet even I can see why they’re playing this high stakes game. Win and in the medium term they get perpetual rule and their Chumbawumba (who, as Jason Williamson from Sleaford Mods rightly says, weren’t political – suitably as Brexit wasn’t – just crap) – wet dream of heavy footballs, less immigrants in your area, more landfills, cheap(er) booze, unrestricted fishing quotas, toxic pesticides, a deregulated Labour market, a deregulated City, a Swiss style tax system (highest rate of tax 11.5% – no matter what you earn), and high carbon emitting lightbulbs can be realised. It’s sold as returning to a time of halcyon innocence, of willing naivety, where posh people could authentically re-enact ‘Up the Junction’ without having to speak Polish or Bulgarian, before we knew Jimmy Saville and Rolf Harris were paedophiles, where the unemployed didn’t rely on the state and just did Steptoe & Son type shit to survive.

Goading Scotland into another referendum, then securing a No vote, would mean they also get to keep Scotland’s resources, and do with them as they please. And after separation from the EU, what purpose does Scottish devolution serve? The law states that the Westminster should hand over control of devolved EU matters to Holyrood, but if there is another referendum with the same result (roughly) as in 2014, what moral or political mandate will a Holyrood lead SNP have to challenge it?

What happened in 2014 has taught me to accept that I could have a no grasp of what’s really happening. I have virtually no control over the outcome (other than my vote), and as someone who is partial to independence I’ll be one of last to recognise when it won’t happen. But I feel certain about this much, with Brexit and Trump we’ve crossed the rubicon, we’ve accepted that individual perception is now more powerful than any collective truth. If Trump remains in situ, he’ll continue to toxify the brand of conservatism he’s come to represent and anyone who isn’t staunchly Unionist, or doesn’t stand to directly benefit from Brexit, could easily conflate his politics with those who oppose independence, and then parse it with what has to be one of the No campaign’s central messages – isolation, with the Tories.

So yeah, Donald Trump continuing in the method could be the deciding factor in Scotland voting Yes. Is this reality?

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Song Of The Day – Colored Music by Colored Music

From the album ‘Colored Music’ (1981)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment