Song Of The Day – Right On by Marvin Gaye

From the album ‘What’s Going On’ (1971)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Luis Suarez and Giorgio Chiellini, what did you see?

suarez chiellini header

So we’re in the midst of the best, most exciting, unpredictable World Cup in generations. Happy days, right?

Nearly. On Tuesday during a match between Italy and Uruguay, an event occurred, which allowed a cultural malignancy to mushroom further.

To characterise the event itself, or rather to attempt one, is disingenuous and on my part hypocritical. It does however lead straight to the core issue, how and why we need to label it, and events like it. To some Luis Suarez either bit, or attempted to bite Giorgio Chiellini on the shoulder, others saw nothing untoward, while some just weren’t sure what had happened.

Afterwards social media, ever the bastion of reasoned and balanced thought, became a cesspit of faux moralisation and outright tribalism. The mainstream media just moralised, because they’ve never done anything remotely immoral of course.

Accuse me of playing devils advocate here if you must, but there is no conclusive evidence one way or the other as to what happened between Suarez and Chiellini, and that’s the problem, this allowed people to see what they wanted, they saw the version of the truth that suited their pre-existing bias or biases. We had people steadfastly declaring that they knew one way or the other, better yet was the derision shown towards those who didn’t see it their way. The hubris and myopia on all sides was staggering.

We’ve come to accept this sectarianism as inevitable when unexplained and or inconclusive events occur. And this time Twitter isn’t to blame. It’s a free-for-all of self-loathing, self-aggrandising and vainglorious self-promotion, that much is clear, but the only alteration it’s made to how we construct our thoughts is procedural. Now these thoughts are instantly evacuated and published, instead of being consigned to a larger conglomerate of festering resentment that would otherwise likely remain sublimated.

The media helped to stir it up further, most reported that Suarez ‘appeared to’ bite Chiellini. The tone was certain, albeit the language still legally vague. However, broadsheets like Telegraph delivered a clearer verdict. Suarez was guilty. Once again the curse of news reporting masquerading as opinion prevailed. And why not? As a style of reportage it cannot fail. It attracts the attention of either those who agree with its message, or those who disagree. Views, clicks or a share of viewership and therefore ad revenue is the priority here, not facts. Luis Suarez and Giorgio Chiellini had a coming together and the referee took no action just isn’t a sexy or exciting headline.

It’s time to accept that this shift is a result of a decline in education, and therefore critical, independent thinking. This has also caused a heightened first world hysteria that became pervasive and accepted as the norm in the aftermath of 9/11’s carnage. And it has shown no signs of abating since. Add in social media and the internet, and it’s exacerbated our obsession with seeing our own opinions and theories informing the prevailing groupthink. That means we’ll do and say anything to justify them, even skewing our perception of physical reality to fit a narrative that transcends it.

Using 9/11 as a starting point for it all is inaccurate, but that was the escalation. In the modern media age the first media scrum around an event that, for a time, was unexplained, was the car crash that killed Princess Diana. Do you remember the media coverage during the twenty-four hours after it? I was in my mid teens and I’d never seen anything like it. The window was small, but during it facts were sparse or non-existent, and (almost) everyone wanted to know what had happened. Instead of reporting the facts, they offered an odd mixture of facts with associated guesswork for us, and then we joined in, albeit mostly confined to private spheres.

A decade later and we find an equivalent to the Luis Suarez/Chiellini situation. The presumptive essence of the language used, ‘appeared to’ immediately reminded me of Madeleine McCann’s ‘disappearance’. Eventually over the days, weeks and months the word ‘disappearance’ somehow became the de facto euphemism for media people and media to project, with the use of surrounding, insinuated language, what they suspected had happened. Speculation, with very little or no facts at all, became the vogue, because there was nothing else to report.

I’m not looking to cast Suarez as a sympathetic figure. While he’s a victim of herd like hysteria, he’s allowed it to become focused on him. I’ve not denying that Luis Suarez could’ve bit Chiellini, he certainly could’ve. That’s not my issue.

None of the pictures are conclusive that he did. That is.

And yet the prevailing and consensus opinion is that he did. It leads me to ask, is having an opinion, no matter what and how it’s informed, all that matters these days? If so, that worries me.

FIFA’s disproportional ban, handed down today, and the confusing and contradictory legalese that supported it, was no surprise.

Why? Not knowing the outcome of something intriguing or unexplained can place people in a desperate state. Because then it becomes about them. Speculation is a form of introspection, part of which means that they have to analyse if their perception, and the subsequent belief as to what happened based upon that perception, is arrived at through rational and critical modes of thought.

The prospect of being faced with something which questions whether your critical faculties are compromised by inherent prejudices and therefore myopia is a frightening prospect. Deflecting that reality by interpreting something as a fact and believing it is crucial to obfuscating the flaws in one’s psyche.

There’s a saying, in fact, it’s actually a belief, that people are incapable of change. Whether it be changing their nature, or the way they think.

If you believe that Suarez bit Chiellini, then you believe that he can’t change and hasn’t, that supports the assumption that because he bit someone before, as he has, twice, he’s done it again.

But, be careful, the accusation can just as easily be made that this belief is indicative of an inability to perceive evidence independently and fairly, which would make you just like Suarez.

Posted in Sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Essential Listening: Something/Anything? – Todd Rundgren (1972)

something anything header for blog

A while ago I discovered a blog called ‘Music Ruined My Life’. As it was a blog full of albums and how these had shaped the author’s musical taste, and therefore life, it made the title glib and ironic. However, as with all ironies, they all originate from a basic truth.

Recently I’ve discovered the theme of ‘Music Ruined My Life’ to be true…ish. Never before has there been so much music. We have a combination of the passing of time and the internet to thank for that. The cumulative effect of this coalescence has created an expectation of relentless gluttony, as access to music, past or present, is instant now. As a consequence time has become completely commoditised. The amount that anybody can set aside for discovering and listening to music has become more precious than ever. You have to do more with less. It poses the question, can or should this be viewed as a problem?

Continuing with ironies, the musician and composer Matthew Herbert suggests that we need to stop making music and listen to all the recorded music that’s been created throughout history, as a large amount of it hasn’t been listened to. This is of course impossible and impractical, but as an idea it’s morally succinct and instructive of the doubt we all have as to whether our own tastes have been informed by a sufficiently holistic exposure to the many genres of the medium. Herbert continues to make music, and he should. All of us possess an intrinsic need to create, something, anything, no matter how esoteric, insignificant or trivial it may seem to someone else.

Sadly this leads to be bad music being made, and part of listening to music is experiencing bad music. Consider it a contractual obligation of sorts that also helps to refine the palate. However, eventually you become jaundiced by mediocrity, especially the thought of sequestering any amount of time to it. Taking that to an extreme, it can lead to a lack of motivation to discover new music organically, as now it’s followed by the knowledge that there’s always something better you could be listening to instead. Often, too often, I find myself capitulating to this notion. Just let some other sucker do the crate digging and then tell me what might be of value.

And that’s how I happened across “Something/Anything” by Todd Rundgren. It was rated high on one of those generic best of the seventies lists that all decent music review websites feel compelled to generate for each decade. Thankfully this album belonged on this list, like all the other classics of its vintage; Exile, Ziggy Stardust, Tago Mago, Led Zeppelin IV, What’s Going On, etc, etc. It showcases great song writing, pure and simple, and that never fails to crush your silly bouts of contemplative ennui.

I’d say Rundgren, it’s seems frivolous to call him Todd, is of a similar profile to one of my favourite bands, who were also at their height during the seventies, Steely Dan. They’re something of a niche commodity that dabbled with mainstream recognition, but that this was ultimately assuaged by prioritising and preferring writing and recording to touring. Nothing suggests that Rundgren has the same aversion to touring, but like Becker and Fagan he’s a prolific songwriter, under many pseudonyms, and a highly thought of producer and arranger. Given how good “Something/Anything” is, the majority of which Rundgren wrote, arranged and produced by himself, it and he should belong to the pantheon of great bands and solo artists of the period. But my prior ignorance of Rundgren’s career leads me to question whether he received the extensive accolades and exposure his work deserved.

The first few bars of ‘Saw The Light’ makes a statement, but of what? It delivers an immediate pastiche of a mid sixties pop fare. It’s bedded on a piano in intermediate key, with the periodic use of deep drum bass acting as the register, it’s punctuated with high pitched symbols and the guitar inflection and dreamy vocals so popularised by the early Beatles. You could imagine the vocal melody being one of John and Paul’s that they couldn’t agree on. The lyrics are appropriately populist cheesy kitsch too, ‘And I love you best/it’s not something that I say in jest/cause you’re different from all the rest…and while I ran off before/but I won’t do it anymore’.

In retrospect it was wise that ‘Saw The Light’ would open the album and be the first single released from it. It’s accessible, likable and therefore relatable. But having experienced the whole album, I find it an odd choice to open the album. It’s emphasises Rundgren’s talent but not his character. You encounter his sarcasm on ‘Intro’ – its title is sarcastic too, as it isn’t technically the album’s intro, just to the B side – where he shows a self depreciating side in encouraging you to partake in a game where you listen for the technical and production flaws on the album which he largely produced. On ‘Saving Grace’, an odd, demonic distorted slurring voice acts as a prelude to yet another slick ballad. At the beginning of ‘Slut’ Rundgren openly and ironically jokes about changing the name of the album to ‘throw money’, before a vibrant Stonesy composition helps fulfil a rather pugnaciously cadenced account of being in a state of tanked up desperation, to the point where he’d settle for a chick with ‘saggy thighs’ and ‘baggy eyes’.

Then there’s ‘Wolfman Jack’. Rundgren prefaces the song by shouting ‘hey baby you’re on a subliminal trip to nowhere’. Why I’m not completely sure. There are parallels with Warren Zevon’s ‘Werewolves of London’ here, and I do wonder whether Rundgren’s effort might’ve partly provided inspiration for Zevon’s effort that arrived later in the decade. Rundgren’s Wolfman works an analogy of a single alpha male’s predilection for bedding bored and or dissatisfied married women, while Zevon’s is an existential fable of a Werewolf cavorting about London.

This is an album that vacillates randomly. And you come to realise that this is the point, the only things these songs are indicative of is Rundgren’s talent, and the disparate and fractured nature of the record’s conception, if anything, fomented it, as it was recorded over multiple sessions, with copious amounts of drugs being consumed experimentally by Rundgren. The title, “Something/Anything”, sums it up perfectly. It’s about the songs, about a songwriter choosing to free himself from conforming to an overarching ethos or method, or the pretentions of marrying ideas to limiting concepts.

That meant nothing was off limits to Rundgren. There are some delightful oddities and odd moments to be found. ‘I Went To The Mirror’ is a stoner lick that approaches a bucolic aesthetic. His gravely tone is reminiscent of Mick Jagger’s on a hollowed out Stones demo from “Let it Bleed Sessions” called ‘I Don’t Care’. On ‘I Went To The Mirror’, Rundgren sounds even more inebriated, like a weakened embittered drunkard who’s slept out in the cold for the most of the night, eventually it fades, suddenly returning with a sinister and austere bluesy guitar. ‘The Night The Carosel Burned Down’ borrows from Sgt Pepper’s ‘Being for The Benefit Of Mr Kite’, its distorted harmonium is a precursor of the sound that would characterise much of Rundgren’s next album ‘A Wizard, a True Star’.

On the majority of the ballads Rundgren’s lyrics are of course broadly applicable, but he’s at his best when does relent and revert into anecdotal personal reflections, as he does on ‘Cold Morning Light’, ‘We sit and drink Victorian tea, and your face wears a smile for me’. These also occur on the album’s more comedic offerings.

‘Some Folks Are Even Whiter Than Me’ is an interesting offering considering the climate of the time in which it was released. It’s only with the application of retrospective contexts does its message carry a significant prophetic weight, reflecting that the demographics of society were irreversibly changing with the shifting modes of cultural identification. Rundgren sidelines himself as someone already unwittingly affected, ‘Some folks is even whiter than me/Some folks is even blacker than me/I got myself caught in the middle somewhere/And that’s just where I want to be’. From here he mocks those still resistant to society inevitably changing, and therefore changing them, through the lazily divisive and futile tribal stereotyping, Some people never can be satisfied/Less they push somebody else around/But I can’t give no aid or take no side/I just watch them drag each other down’. Add in the relentless tempo, which cites amalgamations of black and white music converging, the frenzied Jerry Lee Lewis piano of ‘Great Balls of Fire’, the Maceo Parker-esque sax, that R’n’B guitar so popularised by (mainly) white players, just imbues the song’s message with a nuance than runs deeper than the barbs of lyrical cynicism.

I could offer thoughts on every single song on this album, as they all deserve scrutiny, but there are twenty four of them. So yes, of course my favourite song from the album would be the one where Rundgren wasn’t the principal song writer. The warming melody of ‘Dust In The Wind’ belies a man’s melancholic regret, lamenting past his indiscretions when faced with the consequences of the here and now. It would fit seamlessly onto one of the Stones classic albums from the late sixties to early seventies. It’s a sublime composition, with the guitar solo encouraging the sax to shine, while a beautifully simple piano melody runs throughout. Rundgren voice transcends its ability here, his accent reminiscent of Gram Parsons unfussy delivery, and the chorus is sung as rambunctiously as any of Van Morrison’s hooks necessitated.

What this song does so well is emphasise the lesson to found in this album’s conception and execution. It teaches you not to become immured by doubt, to go with the flow, to hang loose and not over think things. As you can’t experience everything, similarly you can’t do everything. Given his immense talent as a songwriter, you would forgive Rundgren for being egotistical and provincial in taking measures to prevent including ‘Dust In The Wind’ on this record, but he wasn’t. He realised than when something’s good, anything that makes that something better is worth it. That attitude applies to finding good music, only when you accept that music is imperfect and subjective, and the process of finding it completely random, will you discover it.

Posted in Essential Listening | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Song Of The Day – Auto Neutron by Fat White Family

From the album ‘Champagne Holocaust’ (2013)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Song Of The Day – Les Nuits by Nightmares On Wax

From the album ‘Carboot Soul’ (1999)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment