Well my friends we’ve reached the end, but as to how we got here, where to begin?
We might as well start with the first semi-final between Brazil and Germany. The shock and awe which it induced, to be crass, turned out to be the nearest sporting equivalent of the 11th of September attacks.
I was left with mixed emotions. I correctly predicted that Germany would advance, and, in a way, I was right about the manner in which they achieved it, just not its proliferation. They waited, kept possession, until the Brazilians lost patience and or discipline, before scything through them. It was effortless and unselfish football.
But this German idealism was the photo negative of a macabre scene, one of self-loathing, self-pitying and ultimately resentment from the (mostly) middle class white demographic in Brazilian society that populated the ground. Eventually they came to deride a mainly black or mixed race group of now pampered footballers, who used to (mostly) be poor, just for failing to show the application required when their artificial expectations of them had crested.
People have claimed after the fact that the scale of this collapse had been coming for Brazil. This sort of pointless, preening, pious, (hey alliteration) self-aggrandising stating-the-obvious-after-the-fact bollocks always amuses me. It was no surprise that a Brazil side lacking its best defender and only top quality attacking and best player lost to what was, in the abstract, a better side. But 7-1? Nobody picked that, nobody expected it.
Except the select few spawny bastards who put money on 7-1 to Germany. I hate you with a passion that’s usually only reserved for the likes of James Corden, or any other public figure that has become totemic of the vacuous sycophantic reverence that’s shown towards forms of mediocrity these days.
This Brazil side wasn’t held to that fatuous standard by its public, not at first anyway. There was hope rather than expectation, that fan euphoria and promising early results would transcend the inevitability of this side meeting its ceiling. The flaws in this Brazil side were evident from the outset. Scolari wrongly banked on overcompensating with pace and strength to hide an enforced deficit of intelligence and skill. This was epitomised by his preference of Paulinho over Fernandinho to start the tournament. Fortunately Scolari could rectify that mistake, as he included Fernandinho in the squad. But there were others who didn’t make the cut, whose inclusion would’ve pleased the traditionalists and aesthetes, better represented the footballing ideals that tend to pervade the psyche of the Brazilian public, and would’ve likely forced Scolari to adopt a more progressive concept of play. Lucas Moura would’ve offered pace and incisive dribbling, Coutinho a player of immense skill, balance and vision would’ve offered Neymar a genuine technical equal, and Roberto Firmino scored over twenty goals for Hoffenheim this season gone, he’s attracting a lot of interest from some big clubs due to it. Brazil were always going to be short of quality up front, especially as Alexandre Pato’s injuries have failed to clear and Leandro Damiao’s fall was as sudden and precipitous as his meteoric rise.
It’s unclear whether including any of these players would’ve changed the outcome. I’d say it’s unlikely, as Oscar, Willian and Bernard are all technically accomplished players, and they all played significant minutes during the tournament.
Other than a chronic lack of top talent, this was a team who became captivated by the delusional narrative that surrounded it. That tone was set by Marcelo and David Luiz. They defended as if there were no conceivable consequences to their individual actions and decisions within a team framework, almost as if they believed they were deigned to win. It was the opposite of the German attitude, it was self-indulgent and self-serving and Scolari enabled them, by condoning it as part of the team’s success in previous matches. Scolari’s failure to reign in their impetuosity was costly. It nearly proved their undoing against Colombia, but for a set piece goal and wondergoal by David Luiz, which no doubt only served to vindicate the player’s self-righteous notion of destiny.
Against Germany Brazil’s inability to keep possession was always likely to cause problems, but it was exacerbated by the team’s inability, as a collective, to understand the offside rule. It reminded me of a match in the Premier League between Manchester United and Arsenal at Old Trafford three years ago. It finished 8-2 to United. Arsenal had the superficial excuse of only having a makeshift back line available that day. And Arsene Wenger had the reprieve of there being a competitive game to follow it. There was no next game for Brazil if they failed, unless you count the third placed playoff. Only fucking FIFA would inflict such a dismal spectacle of twenty-two men, wallowing in self-pity and playing in a resentful half arsed manner, on humanity.
Brazil’s full backs, like Arsenal’s against United, tracked runners six yards behind while the centre backs stepped up, or just showed a lack of application and cohesion in stepping up themselves. Like United did that day, the Germans kept attacking the same way, waiting for the inevitable mistakes to facilitate their neat play. Marcelo, Maicon and David Luiz were the worst offenders; they did what they wanted, when they wanted. They were completely oblivious to where their teammates were, and what they were doing, as they were with Thomas Muller, Miroslav Klose, Mesut Ozil, Toni Kroos and Sami Khedira, who couldn’t believe their luck and the space they had to operate in.
Bastain Schweinsteiger, positioned himself regally between Germany’s centre backs and, along with Kroos, dictated the game with neat triangles and their teammates offering perpetual third man running. They regularly found the void between defence and midfield, the visual analogy of Brazil’s now terminally syphilitic brain.
The fourth goal summed up the difference between the sides. Fernandinho, a fine player, now infected by the malaise around him, dithered on the ball. Khedira and Kroos pounced, unafraid of what Brazil had to offer in possession should they fail to dispossess Fernandinho and he was able to slither beyond them. Luiz, Marcelo and Maicon were somewhere else, psychologically, metaphorically. So were Germany, they were in the final.
Where they’ll play Argentina.
I could write a thousand words about their game against the Netherlands, but I’m not a fucking masochist. It was awful stuff. No doubt it was right up Rafa Benitez’s and Jose Mourinho’s street.
The Dutch did their usual thing of playing the Mourinho-esque bunker football that he’s laughably lauded as a genius for by bird-brained football pundits. At least Van Gaal has the excuse of not being able to conceivably buy anyone. This is what he had to work with, but even so the Dutch have enough talent not to devolve to using a plodding back three, with two limited but hard running wing backs sitting deep and two destroyers in front of them. Starting with seven defensively minded and positioned players is a limiting paradigm, and it’s sad to see the Dutch adopt such a tactic. The Dutch vintages of 1974 and 1988, hell, even the European Championships of 2000 seem to belong to another country.
Worryingly, looking forwards to the final, Argentina weren’t much better, and certainly not good enough to break down the ghastly Dutch concoction they were faced with. Germany will afford Messi more terrain to work in than he had here, and while they’ll still double mark and occasionally swarm him, it won’t be with the ferocity that the Dutch used, nor will it be with as many defenders goalside, or with the whole team condensed from such a deep starting position.
It was fitting that something typically synonymous with Dutch football and Louis Van Gaal would converge disastrously with the poverty of the talent it attempted to inculcate. Just why was Ron Vlaar, a technical mediocre artificially elevated by a negative system, allowed to take the first penalty in the shootout, when Huntelaar, Sneijder, Kuyt and the utterly brilliant Arjen Robben were available?
We’ve heard the causes, or excuses as to why, but their arrival is always inevitable in the aftermath of failure. It was either astonishingly arrogant and or stupid on Van Gaal’s part to allow it. There’s no doubt that Vlaar felt confident heading into the penalties. He’d contained Lionel Messi. But Van Gaal should’ve seen past this temporary psychological buoyancy, and that his tactics had largely created it. In such circumstances it’s not a stretch to imagine Van Gaal seeing Vlaar as an extension of his own successful strategising, and believing in its transformative powers. Of course we’re talking fine margins here. If Vlaar scores then Van Gaal looks like a genius for allowing Vlaar to take it, and that notion must’ve sat well with the bravura hubris that innately permeates Van Gaal’s thought processes.
It would’ve been logical to have Robben, Sneijder, Kuyt and Huntelaar taking the final four penalties in the shootout, provided you were ahead, but they weren’t, and in the end Huntelaar didn’t even get to take one, as the Argentineans scored all of theirs. That’s a waste of resources. Louis Van Gaal, as punishment for offending the thought police, aka the sabremetrical community, you will now be disowned by your friends, family and work colleges, and someone with the clap, having eaten four packets of Wotsits, will piss in your mouth.
Football is a game often complicated by the human psyche’s susceptibility to vanity, pressure and the fear of failure. In sports they are the three pillars of rationality. Here Van Gaal failed to contemplate the latter. The lesson here is simple, use your best penalty takers first, as they’re more likely to score and put you in a position to win. Or to put it another way, in that situation you should ask yourself WWGD? (What Would Germany Do) Score them all and win is the answer. Good riddance to this version of the Netherlands. May they return to us with the adventure, pace and skill that befits their shirt’s mythology.
So, how will the final go?
First we have to accept that Germany is at an advantage here. They have the better team, they have a greater abundance of technical ability, particularly in midfield, and Argentina are coming off a days less rest, and having gone to extra time.
Argentina has Lionel Messi, so they have a chance. However, he looked exhausted against the Netherlands, and tried to do too much on his own. At this point he clearly doesn’t trust many of his teammates to help him or help themselves.
Argentina needs to score first, if they’re chasing the game, against a side that keeps possession so well, they’ll be in difficulty.
Germany plays a brand of football that can lend itself to open contests, but only if they’re behind, as we saw against Ghana in the group stages. They play a high line in an attempt to punish the opposition’s technical deficiencies, allowing them to win back possession and to have immediate and multiple passing options. Forget the Brazil game – that was the outlier. A mundane and realistic example of how well this can work was against France in the quarter-final.
The best hope for Argentina is to defend stoutly, and use their strength – Messi and the abundance of quick attackers they possess – to penetrate the German backline on the counter attack. The problem is Jogi ‘Bear’ Low, what a fucking fantastically conglomerated name/nickname that reads as, has now sussed his best line-up for his favoured tactics. Per Mertesacker, too slow for the high defensive line, is gone. Boateng and Hummels offer greater mobility and technical stability. By moving Philipp Lahm to full back it essentially offers Germany, when in possession, another highly technically accomplished player in a position which is so often populated with athletes that play without nuance, the kind which Germany were fielding earlier in the tournament. Lahm has the stamina of a full back, but turns, shimmies, passes and thinks like midfield lynchpin. And he’s a leader. Quite a player.
Moving Muller to a wide position makes it harder for the opposition to account for his whereabouts. It also liberates him from the duties of a centre forward and plays to his strengths; off the ball movement and an innate ability to be in the right place at the right time. Miroslav Klose will start again, and he’ll occupy, ironic use of occupy here as he was born in Poland, the two Argentinean centre backs, allowing Ozil, Muller, Khedira and Kroos to float in and around whatever spaces he can create. Expect the Germans to target Marcos Rojo in particular, whose positioning and ability to defend in space is highly questionable.
I’m in little doubt that Argentina will field three midfielders against Germany, Biglia and Mascherano are destroyers rather than artistes, and without help they simply won’t be able to withstand the pressure that they’ll be put under. They struggled to create or dictate against a Dutch midfield that retreated, this German midfield won’t. Enzo Perez will probably be the third man. He played well against the Dutch, and can beat men in bursts. He’s also versatile enough to operate on the flank should Argentina look to start Higuain with Messi just behind. Argentina needs someone other than Messi to calmly create time and space, and keep possession in crowded areas. Perez can do this. It would help Argentina immensely if Angel Di Maria’s workrate and pace is available, he’s flawed but he’s also easily better than Ezequiel Lavezzi. It wouldn’t surprise me if we see Gonzalo Higuain sacrificed with Messi moved up front, with Di Maria and Lavezzi offering outlets on the flanks in an attempt to access the space beyond the German full backs. In theory this would create more room to liberate Messi’s creative dribbling and hopefully passing, which he did too little of against the Dutch.
We know that Germany will field an unchanged team and we know how they’ll play. There’s two ways of looking at this, that it makes it easier for Ajeandro Sabella to plan against, or as I prefer, it makes it more likely Germany will be comfortable and ready to perform. I don’t think this Argentinean defence or team will be able to cope with the relentless passing, creativity and movement of Germany’s midfield and attack, nor the intelligence of its pressing without the ball. They will score at least twice.
Argentina has the world’s best player, and may he shine in the biggest game in his career. But football’s a team game, and Germany has the better side.
Prediction: Germany 3 – Argentina 1
And above all may the game be as exciting as the scoreline suggests.
I’ll take this opportunity to apologise in advance to the nation of Germany, the German national team, all Germans, German supporters and those who bet on them to win for dooming their team and their dreams. I’ve been on too good a run, so I’m due to get one catastrophically wrong. Sorry.
PS. I just want to thank the thirty people who have read my blog this month. I really appreciate it. You’ll be glad to hear that the end of the World Cup means I can go back to writing insufferably earnest and pretentious articles about politics, music and culture. Because having no readers is fun.
Oh, and I almost forgot, the end of the World Cup means no Adrian Chiles for a while. With any luck Fabio Cannavaro’s botoxed smile will wear off, the horror of his ordeal will psychologically break him, and he’ll break Adrian Chiles into little pieces which Patrick Vieira will then freeze and eat incrementally over the winter. Bon Appétit.
Pingback: The 2014-15 Premier League Preview | Wichita Lineman Was A Song I Once Heard