Black Friday – a disgruntled view from the side-lines.

Black Friday header

I fucking hate Tesco. I hate their patronising slogan. It irks me that they flatten hundreds of family run shops or small businesses every year. They pay their shop floor employees fuck all. Their brand products are all, without exception, absolutely minging, and they’re ubiquitous, but…yeah, that’s actually a positive in this instance as there’s one a five minute walk away from me on Maryhill Road. Even better some of their stores are open twenty-four hours a day, as the one closest to me is.

Or so I assumed, as I turned up to find it wasn’t early last Friday morning. You see, as I’m completely unconcerned with most vacuous cultural phenomenon, it hadn’t registered that it was “Black Friday”, the product of a quintessential American trait – cultishly venal capitalism, that’s been shamelessly transplanted to all four corners of the globe. Regardless, quite why this meant that the twenty-four hour Tesco in Maryhill would be shut at 6:45am on “Black Friday” I wasn’t sure. That is, until I did some reading on last year’s mania that occurred on “Black Friday”.

Remaining closed until 7:30 in the morning was, I assume, to allow them to prepare for any onslaught, but at a reasonable hour, and I hope, but doubt, to show compassion for their staff. The Tesco bosses seemed convinced that if they let them, these peculiar, paganistic, rabid, shameless, fixated, unfulfilled, desperate because they’re unfulfilled shoppers would burst through the doors at one minute past midnight to fight over televisions, laptops, toasters, and the assorted garishly cheap kitsch that seems to only be produced to quench rampant materialism.

I’ll confess that I find the love others have for shopping confusing. At best it’s boring and time consuming, at worst you feel like you’re being extorted. It doesn’t matter how you do it, either online (clearly the lesser of the two evils) or in person, which is now an unbearable experience where you have to navigate aisles filled with people not watching or caring where they’re going. Sometimes they’re looking at their iPhones (because they’re bored), or scanning the shelves while on the phone to someone else (because they need reassurance or advice for something this banal). Invariably you’ll encounter a couple thoroughly debating which salad dressing to buy. Or worse yet they have their kids with them, and in an attempt to placate them for the depressingly mind-numbing ordeal of being dragged around a supermarket, they’ve been indulged with enough sugar to send them into mouth foaming hyperactivity (just to raise the collective family blood pressure even more). Most commonly you see shoppers just wandering around in that overwhelmed trance like state that seems to descend when too much choice and too little time combine to create perpetual indecision.

But that’s what makes “Black Friday” different. It’s been cleverly constructed to ensure consumer indecision is vanquished. Customers are aware in advance of the promise of a discount, so the decision to buy something has already been made, as it’s easier to justify when you’re getting a bargain, or believe you are. This is motivated by an attempt to right a perpetual injustice foisted upon consumers for the convenience supermarkets offer, as we all know that, deep down, we vastly overpay for pretty much everything in them. Throw Black Friday’s timing into the mix, Christmas is all but a month away, and unless you’re a selfish narcissist like me you’ll have already given some thought as to what to get your mum, dad, sister, daughter or husband for the biggest annual extortion of them all. All you need to do is find something that matches what you had in mind and it’ll have been a success. You’ll have beaten, or ‘gamed’, the system, just this once.

The explanation for the extreme examples of brawling for Black Friday bargains we’re shown is simple, it’s a manifestation, or better yet a means of releasing the pressure we put on ourselves to make our wages count when married with the natural selection instinct to subjugate and hoard at the expense of competitors. This takes many forms, some ingrained into our cultural identity by tradition – getting on the housing ladder is the most common, and specific to Black Friday it’s an extreme affectation of what motivates people to queue outside a shop overnight for the latest gadgetry advance, as they derive pride and receive acclaim by the very thought of being able to reminisce that they were one of the first to have the right to buy the latest games console or smartphone.

I recognise that any endeavours, which are impulse driven, are rarely rational, but Black Friday’s case, will you, three years from now, lament your failure to secure a bargain, that saved you, say, £65? Of course not, it’s about feeding instant validation, especially in the digital age where money is mostly theoretical, so being able to boost your vanity and self-worth with physical representations of earnings and wealth carries more significance than ever. But any justifications for partaking in the event are never as honest as that. Why would one of those who were victorious on “Black Friday”, relinquish the opportunity to bask in the superciliousness its narrative affords? ‘I suffered just to get it for you babe. I went in the trenches, just like my great-grandfather did at the Somme, and survived going over the top (literally I did – this Samsung S6 came from the top of the tower) and held on to it for dear life as the limbs and gnashing teeth whirled around me, and when some dickhead blocked the checkout I escaped by bayoneting him with my car key’.

Perhaps I should be thankful that I was spared an ordeal worse than what usually constitutes my regular Supermarket Sweep (I just wanted to buy some dental floss, eggs, tomatoes, tangerines, a lettuce, a pack of Twixes and some milk), but in reality nobody is quite desperate enough to go all ‘Midnight Express’ just after midnight on Friday morning at a twenty-four hour supermarket. Still, as I’m (hopefully?) moving to Knightswood in January, these precautionary measures will probably never inconvenience me again. Or do they observe Black Friday the same way there too?

Posted in Odds & Ends | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Song Of The Day – Get Behind The Mule by Tom Waits

From the album ‘Mule Variations’ (1999)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Song Of The Day – Applause by Lady Gaga

From the album ‘Artpop’ (2013)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Terrorism, a word thoroughly abused.

bombdogs

If there’s one thing that’s really been getting on my tits recently it’s how the word Terrorism is wielded. In truth it always has done. Terrorism, if we take its literal meaning, and ignore its widely implied use by politicians and the current shitty vogue of news coverage masquerading as opinion in its post eleventh of September hysteria, incites ‘intense, overpowering fear’, and causes ‘panic or dread’. Through constant use, in conjunction with the attention paid to Terrorism, this has re-contextualised the word as a euphemistic device. Now it only needs to be said to imply that the momentary panic and fear that occurs during an attack should linger, and that our dread over it happening to us should be omnipresent.

Thankfully, even if we’ve accepted this implication we haven’t adopted its psychology. Our response to the continuous reporting of the government’s cynical raising of the ‘threat level’ is to blithely shrug our shoulders. Odder still, once you break things down, we find a diametrically opposed consensus – the terrorists and the politicians all agree of Terrorism’s importance and their (Islamic State’s) influence, while we do not.

The reason is obvious – nobody wants to be scared and only a masochist would choose to be. Witnessing many acts of its ilk over the past twenty years hasn’t made people more afraid, or dread being the victim of ideological or religious extremism, as they’ve become as commonplace as campus or high school shootings are in the US. Better yet it hasn’t made anyone who directly witnessed and survived a terrorist attack in person more scared either. If anything we accept that these violent reactions will randomly occur, as it reinforces a truth – that living in countries that are democratic and diverse is preferable to living under a theocracy or military dictatorship sustained by subjugation and the persecution of minorities, the kind that Islamic State wishes to emulate. I’d argue that people in western countries are far more likely to dread not being able to repay their mortgages or that they’re more scared of getting cancer than being shot by a Jihadist or blown up by a suicide bomber.

Even better, as the trite, highly selective, piece of terminology it’s become, it causes another problem – just what should the likes of Anders Breivik be branded as? Allow me to ask the question whether he should be at all? Nonetheless, it was noticeable that while Breivik’s attack was initially described as an act of terror – before it was established who was responsible (not who was first suspected) and why he claimed he did it – very few now describe him as a terrorist, or his acts as terrorism. It’s a sickening hypocrisy, as Breivik’s goals were no different to that of Islamic terrorism, nor suitably, due to the frequency of the attacks and the saturation of the word Terrorism, was the meagre impact of its legacy. Breivik was driven by a pathological hatred of secular values that tend to encourage change, strip social and religious traditions of their relevance, emancipates choice, increases minority rights and protects freedom of speech, the kind of stuff that invariably leads to artistic expression, volatile and fluid attitudes towards sex and identity and the one religious ideologues hate the most, materialistic hedonism.

Given that’s what Terrorism is really trying to destroy, I suggest we call acts committed in the name of an extremist, highly selective interpretation of religious or ideological doctrines what they really are – fascism (or something daft, say Bombdogs). It would successfully quarantine and side-line Terrorism’s new meaning and blunt the subsequent self-harm its affords; whether it’s the opportunity for the brazenly racist and xenophobic to counter-punch (like Breivik), its use by those pitifully pious pseudo liberals to attack western interventionism as being to blame, or attacks and the threat of Islamic State attacks being used by governments as an excuse to erode our rights with authoritarian laws passed ‘for our own safety’.

Because let’s face it, we’re not scared, there’s no dread before or after, and I think we’re starting to get tired of being told that we should be, and above all, using the word the way we’re using it is giving these dickheads too much credit.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Song Of The Day – Hold Tight by Change

From the single ‘Hold Tight’ (1981)

Posted in Song Of The Day | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment